06/11/2023 / By News Editors
Update: On Thursday, Biden answered a reporter who asked about congressional Republicans claiming he “sold out the country” by taking a $5 million bribe from a Ukrainian oligarch by asking, “Where is the money?”
(Article by Kelen McBreen republished from Infowars.com)
“I’m joking,” Biden said, adding, “It’s a bunch of malarkey.”
Rep. Andy Biggs (R-Ariz.) assured the American public on Thursday the House Oversight Committee’s investigation into a reported $5 million bribe to then Vice President Joe Biden will result in the House impeaching Sleepy Joe.
Fox Business host Maria Bartiromo asked Biggs if impeachment is the next step after Congress learned of an FBI informant’s allegations Biden took the bribe from a Ukrainian oligarch.
“Absolutely,” Biggs responded. “He would need to be impeached and then once he was impeached… hopefully there’d be some Democrats in the Senate that would recognize how grave the situation is and encourage him to resign like Goldwater did to Nixon. But, once he’s out of there, then he would have to be indicted because this is gross criminal misconduct and some would even suggest treasonous.”
NEW: Rep. Andy Biggs says the House will “absolutely” be impeaching Joe Biden in response to the FBI document that allegedly claims Biden accepted a $5 million bribe.
Biggs also asserted that Biden must be indicted after impeachment.
“He would have to be indicted because this… pic.twitter.com/DvpslYudhj
— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) June 8, 2023
“We have got to find out how extensive this was. And then we have to take action,” the GOP congressman continued. “I mean enough talk. Talk is talk, but if we produce this evidence that we’re starting, that’s starting to pile up. By the way, there’s so much evidence that’s voluminous that’s taking everything we have with our staff to go through this. But as it piles up, if it is consistent with where the direction it seems to be headed, he should be impeached. And the Democrats cannot defend them with the lies going out that we heard earlier this week, they’re gonna have to come to grips with this thing.”
Biggs’ comments come a day after the FBI caved to pressure from the House Oversight Committee as it threatened to hold the bureau’s director Christopher Wray in contempt for withholding subpoenaed documents.
The committee’s chair, Rep. James Comer, (R-Ky.), explained, “After weeks of refusing to even admit the FD-1023 record exists, the FBI has caved and is now allowing all members of the Oversight and Accountability Committee to review this unclassified record that memorializes a confidential human source’s conversations with a foreign national who claimed to have bribed then-Vice President Joe Biden.”
“Americans have lost trust in the FBI’s ability to enforce the law impartially and demand answers, transparency, and accountability,” Comer added. “Allowing all Oversight Committee members to review this record is an important step toward conducting oversight of the FBI and holding it accountable to the American people.”
After viewing the FBI documents, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) spoke to the press, saying, “Reading this form today shows the pure distinction. This information, this source that came forward, it’s a paid informant by the FBI. This has nothing to do with [Rudy] Giuliani, this has nothing to do with the information he brought forward in 2020, and it’s extremely credible because he’s a paid informant.”
I just read the FBI’s FD-1023 form implicating Joe Biden in a political bribery pay-to-play scheme.
Here’s what the American people deserve to know. pic.twitter.com/b3X8qh9MPf
— Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene?? (@RepMTG) June 8, 2023
MTG went on to explain that in 2015, the Ukrainian gas company Burisma, which had hired Hunter Biden the year prior, was looking to buy a U.S. oil and gas company using Hunter’s connections.
Around this time, Joe Biden said Ukrainian prosecutor Viktor Shokin was “corrupt” and threatened to withhold $1 billion from the European nation.
Throughout this process, the FBI informant behind the Biden allegations was witnessing the entire thing go down from the inside.
According to the paid FBI mole, the president of Burisma told him he’d previously paid $5 million to two different members of the Biden family in a bribe to get Shokin fired and end his investigation into Burisma.
Eventually, the company head allegedly told the informant he indeed sent money directly to Joe and Hunter Biden.
“This was definitely illegal for a vice president of the United States and his family members,” MTG said before pledging to continue investigating the matter.
Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.) also saw the document, telling The Benny Show‘s Benny Johnson on Thursday, “What I can say is, this has been going on for many years and there was a 5 million dollar payment made to Joe Biden. Not Hunter Biden, Joe Biden, ‘The Big Guy’.”
“It’s clearly laid out that they [Burisma] used Hunter Biden because he was ‘stupid’ and that he could go through his dad for protection and that it would all just go away anyway,” she said.
Burisma is now a top trending topic on Twitter.
Infowars has been exposing the Hunter Biden Burisma scandal alongside fellow alternative media outlets for years now and this information would already be widely known if it weren’t for Big Tech censorship and mainstream media gatekeepers.
Check out some of our exclusive coverage of Hunter’s shady business deals in the videos below:
Read more at: Infowars.com
Tagged Under:
Biden, Biden crime family, bribe, bribery, corruption, crime, impeachment, national security, politics, traitors, treason
This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author
COPYRIGHT © 2017 GOVTSLAVES.COM
All content posted on this site is protected under Free Speech. GovtSlaves.com is not responsible for content written by contributing authors. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. GovtSlaves.com assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. All trademarks, registered trademarks and service marks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.